In short, peer teaching occurs when
students, by design, teach other students.
But teaching what? And how? Austin Community College provided an
overview of some of the existing (though decades old) research in a collection
of resources for teachers in training, which provides a nice context for peer
teaching.
“There is a wealth of evidence that peer teaching is extremely
effective for a wide range of goals, content, and students of different levels
and personalities (McKeachie et al., 1986). Peer teaching involves one or more
students teaching other students in a particular subject area and builds on the
belief that “to teach is to learn twice” (Whitman, 1998).”
“Peer teaching can enhance learning by enabling learners to take
responsibility for reviewing, organizing, and consolidating existing knowledge
and material; understanding its basic structure; filling in the gaps; finding
additional meanings; and reformulating knowledge into new conceptual
frameworks’ (Dueck, 1993).”
“Help from peers increases learning both for the students being
helped as well as for those giving the help. For the students being helped, the
assistance from their peers enables them to move away from dependence on teachers and gain more opportunities to enhance their learning. For
the students giving the help, the cooperative learning groups serve as
opportunities to increase their own performance. They have the chance to
experience and learn that “teaching is the best teacher” (Farivar and Webb,
1994).”
In lieu of the benefits peer teaching and learning provide, it has
a mixed reputation in education to its abuse via ‘let the ‘high’ students
teaching the ‘low’ students’ which, done poorly, fails to meet the needs of
both.
Peer Learning
David Boud of Stanford University explored the concepts of peer
teaching, learning, and reciprocal peer learning in a short overview of
existing research–which is limited. Though the context he discusses is
primarily in the higher-ed domain where peer teaching is a literal component of
most university learning models, the concepts transfer to K-12 as well.
According to Boud, peer learning is obviously closely related,
“We define peer learning in its broadest sense, then, as ‘students
learning from and with each other in both formal and informal ways’. The
emphasis is on the learning process, including the emotional support that
learners offer each other, as much as the learning task itself. In peer
teaching the roles of teacher and learner are fixed, whereas in peer learning
they are either undefined or may shift during the course of the learning
experience. Staff may be actively involved as group facilitators or they may
simply initiate student-directed activities such as workshops or learning
partnerships.”
As for the limited research data, Boud continues,
‘According to Topping’s review of literature, surprisingly little
research has been done into either dyadic reciprocal peer tutoring or same-year
group tutoring (Topping, 1996). He identified only 10 studies, all with a very
narrow, empirical focus. This suggests that the teaching model, rather than the
learning model, is still the most common way of understanding how students
assist each other. Although the teaching model has value, we must also consider
the learning process itself if we want to make the best use of peers as
resources for learning.”
Whitman and Fife (1989) summarize research that was to that
point current, below.
“Recommendations from current literature include the following:
learning may occur when students work cooperatively, both peer teachers and
peer learners learn, and learning may increase with a blend of situations in
which professors are present and are not present.”
A significant portion of existing discourse on peer teaching
relate to its application in the medical field, or language learning. A study published at
Oxford Academic’s ELT Journal in 2017 added little new information, with the
abstract concluding, “The use of peer teaching in the language classroom offers
a creative way for students to participate more fully in the learning process,”
and alluding to “(p)revious studies (that) have reported that peer taught
lessons bring benefits such as improved motivation, enhanced learning, and
authentic communication.”